Concept- and Mind-mapping

 

Click on the branches for the commentary

What are they?

They are simply kinds of diagrams or maps of conceptual rather than physical fields.  [Back]

Concept maps

May have more than one central point and show how topics relate to each other in multiple ways.A concept map on concept mapping can be found here They are more flexible and less hierarchical than mind-maps, perhaps more suited to diagramming networks of connections. (But who cares about the labels? In many cases this is a distinction without a difference.) [Back]

Mind-maps

As appropriated by Tony Buzan (who seems to think he invented them; "mind mapping" is a apparently a registered trademark of the Buzan organisation), these are concept maps branching from a single central node; they are not as flexible as concept maps, but may be easier to manage by students in lectures, which notionally start from a single topic. [Back]

How can I use them?

How can you not? The main point is their capacity to reflect how we think. Few of us are totally linear and serial thinkers. If I look at any page of my note-books, I find I have naturally drawn connecting lines between ideas and topics; a concept map is simply an extension of this to lay out points visually. [Back]

Get students to use them

Many students will have been introduced to them at school, but may feel that they are not appropriate in the rarefied academic atmosphere of a university. Not so. They are a great way of organising lecture notes, particularly in the way in which they reflect the priorities of the subject.

Everyone's concept map of a topic will be different, and that's desirable. While there is quite a lot to be said for lecturers using them, it is the act of creating them which is more important than having a definitive "authorised" version. [Back]

To keep track

You can use developing and evolving concept-maps throughout a lecture (or a sequence of lectures) to show which topics have been covered (here in green) and which are current (here in yellow). They can of course start in a very basic form and be elaborated with new branches and connections as you go along. [Back]

Promoting relational thinking

Creating your own mind-map requires decisions about how topics relate to each other, and the nature of the connections between issues at the same hierarchical level, which encourage work at least at the multi-dimensional level of the SOLO taxonomy, and probably at the relational level as well.

Presentation packages tend to encourage us to reduce material to an unremitting barrage of bullet-points, gobbets of information related only by the order of their introduction (which is often not that important anyway), and it can be argued that this fragmentation of knowledge discourages making connections. Anything which re-connects material into a coherent body of knowledge is to be welcomed. [Back]

Pedigree

Pace Tony Buzan, look at a mediaeval "mappa mundi"; we tend to regard such maps as geographically naive, but they are as much about world-views as views of the world. On mappa mundiThey are firmly in the tradition of concept- and mind-mapping. Another source credits Leonardo da Vinci with inventing them. Concept maps, as diagrams, have been around for hundreds of years; Comenius' Orbis Pictus (1658) was probably the first to introduce labelled pictures into an educational text.

Concept maps really were invented by one person, Joe Novak[Back]

Technical issues

There is a great deal to be said for drawing mind-maps in particular by hand; hand-drawn versions are far less constrained by the technical limitations of software, and are easy to annotate and expand (and rub out if done in pencil or on the whiteboard). If you are doing one yourself, why not build it up on a whiteboard or flip-chart as a live parallel to pre-prepared material on the projector?

Dyslexic learners often find mind-maps friendly, because the location of the text on the page provides an additional clue to its meaning. [Back]

Cautions

Software

There is a lot of mind-mapping software available if you need to prepare maps on a machine, although simple concept maps in particular can readily be prepared in a simple drawing package, including those available in presentation applications within office suites.

The maps on this site were prepared with a very old version of MindManager. Other similar commercial packages are available, but note:

Edward Tufte on why "PowerPoint is evil" his complaint is substantially with the dead hand of the bullet-point, the antithesis of a concept-map

See "What works..."

and "Innovations"

To reference this page copy and paste the text below:

Atherton J S (2013) Learning and Teaching; [On-line: UK] retrieved from

Original material by James Atherton: last up-dated overall 10 February 2013

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License.

Search Learningandteaching.info and associated sites:

Delicious Save this on Delicious        Click here to send to a friend     Print

This site is independent and self-funded, although the contribution of the Higher Education Academy to its development via the award of a National Teaching Fellowship, in 2004 has been greatly appreciated. The site does not accept advertising or sponsorship (apart from what I am lumbered with on the reports from the site Search facility above), and invitations/proposals/demands will be ignored, as will SEO spam. I am of course not responsible for the content of any external links; any endorsement is on the basis only of my quixotic judgement. Suggestions for new pages and corrections of errors or reasonable disagreements are of course always welcome. I am not on FaceBook or LinkedIn.

Back to top